Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Zealots of Psusan/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Zealots of Psusan/Legends

  • Nominated by: Skifffy (talk) 03:13, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 07:21, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 768 words (144 introduction, 492 body, 132 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 805 words (189 introduction, 482 body, 134 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:WOMEN

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 23:27, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 23:46, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Great work! Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Be mindful of double refs. Otherwise, another great nomination. :) Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 04:20, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

spookly
  • The statement "were created for the prequel trilogy film Star Wars: Episode II Attack of the Clones" would require either additional referencing to support that claim or to be changed to something less specific. This is often because we have many things that were "created" so to say for some prior project but then later first used or first appeared in something else, so less specific wording is used in the cases that are not 100% confirmably created for a specific media.
  • Inside the Worlds of Star Wars: Attack of the Clones does not need a full release date and would only need the year, as it is the only 2003 source being discussed.
  • The BTS is better off being more closely ordered chronologically --> 1stm (imo, reference book) --> 1st (Fett book) --> AOTC. As it is, it sort of works backward, which isn't the standard.
  • I'm not really seeing the relevance of the last BTS sentence unless there was any interviews or any time they talked or commented about their work on that to indicate referential need. Otherwise whenever further details about characters are revealed, we still don't BTS document the source regurgitation of the Sources section so to say.
  • Regarding the Revenge subsection of the body, the image caption seems like a full sentence and should have ending punctuation.—spookywillowwtalk 16:34, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
    • All adressed Skifffy (talk) 00:37, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • The date note for Shee's death needs some additional info since it doesn't currently explain why the Alliance's formation date is relevant to Shee's death. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:20, 31 October 2025 (UTC)