Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Yarr Gatonne

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Yarr Gatonne
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Chack
        • 1.1.2.2 Grunny
        • 1.1.2.3 Cav
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Yarr Gatonne

  • Nominated by: Skippy Farlstendoiro 15:05, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I can be bored sometimes, can't I?

(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Inqvote --Eyrezer 04:45, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Need I reiterate? Skippy never disappoints.—Tommy 9281 17:22, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Grunny (talk) 03:07, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
  4. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 06:44, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Looks great, good job!DarthRage(User talk:DarthRage)
  6. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 17:48, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Chack
  • The sentence about his cybernetic eye in the intro doesn't flow with the one after it; it just seems stuck in there. Chack Jadson (Talk) 15:47, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
    • Better? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 19:52, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
Grunny
  • Missing ref for "Rebellion era" in the infobox, and I wasn't sure which of the two sources to go with as I don't have them handy.
    • D'oh! Added. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 18:32, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
  • "Gatonne was considered to be calm, sophisticated, and with a forceful presence." – does the source specify who considered him to be calm, sophisticated, with a forceful presence, specifying whose point of view this opinion came from? Grunny (talk) 09:30, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
    • In fact, the omniscient narrator says Gatonne was calm. Thus, he "was" calm, not "was considered" calm. Changed. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 18:32, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
Cav
  • Last paragraph of biography is currently unsourced. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 10:54, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
    • Typo. Solved. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 14:23, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:49, August 5, 2010 (UTC)


  • Hey Skip, I hope you don't mind that I moved the P&T image to the other side, only because it was displacing the section headings while on the left. If unacceptable you deem, feel free to move it back.—Tommy 9281 17:22, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
    • It's cool with me. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 17:23, July 29, 2010 (UTC)