Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Xad

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Xad
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/3 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Objections, objections…
        • 1.1.2.2 Cav
        • 1.1.2.3 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Xad

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 01:24, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(4 ACs/3 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. —Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 12:18, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Provided Cav is all set.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 01:42, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Xad1358 JangFett (Talk) 19:46, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:19, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
  5. --Talrrivanian JaingHead (Headquarters) 17:06, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Fixed a redlink for you. Supreme Emperor (talk) 19:30, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
  7. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 21:48, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Objections, objections…
  • Can you add what era he lived in, ex. "lived during the time of the rebellion against the Empire," or something along those lines?—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 06:49, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • Added. That better? Thanks for looking at it. 501st dogma(talk) 00:55, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
      • Awesome, no problem.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 01:49, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
Cav
  • There, after the EF76 Nebulon-B escort frigate Far Orbit, a new privateering vessel for the Alliance to Restore the Republic after some of its crew mutinied out from under Imperial control, docked at the station, Xad applied for a berth on the ship in response to a call for new crew members to crew the Far Orbit. - bit of a run on sentence here. Can you split it up into two sections? - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 14:56, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
    • Split. Thanks for the review. 501st dogma(talk) 00:55, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • The "First appearance" tag should not be used in the Sources list. It should either be a "First mentioned" tag, or that item should be moved to an Appearances section, depending on its content. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:30, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
    • Sorry, that section's supposed to be an Appearance one. Fixed. 501st dogma(talk) 23:29, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 22:00, March 1, 2013 (UTC)