Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/X-45 sniper rifle

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 X-45 sniper rifle
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/5 Users/8 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Kilson
        • 1.1.2.2 Forty-five
        • 1.1.2.3 Prepare to be savaged…
      • 1.1.3 Comments

X-45 sniper rifle

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 15:01, August 31, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Thought I'd squeeze one more in before the barn-burner's over.

(3 ACs/5 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. Looks good.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:20, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Kilson(Let's have a chat) 16:07, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
  3. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 00:23, September 17, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Menkooroo 14:35, September 24, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Nice barn-burner addition.--Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 23:02, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
  6. ~SavageBOB sig 00:56, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
  7. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 04:18, September 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Kilson
  • In the Intro, you should mention during what time periods the X-45 was used.
    • Addressed.
  • Otherwise, nice job Jinn. Thanks for doing another barn-burner nom. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 22:55, August 31, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 17:13, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
Forty-five
  • Using the X-45 allowed the shooter to pick off his target almost invisibly. I'm not really sure what this means. Who is invisible? Am I dumb, or can it be explained a little more?
    • Clarified.
  • As the intro calls the weapon's fragility a downside, can this be communicated in the "Description" section too?
    • Done.
  • Should the "The" of "The Riflette" be in quotation marks in the infobox? The article itself doesn't include "the" in quotes. Would just "Riflette" be more appropriate in the infobox, to be consistent with the article?
    • Addressed.
  • Excellent work! Menkooroo 15:45, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 14:31, September 24, 2011 (UTC)
Prepare to be savaged…
  • Just one thing: Gundark's and Arms & Equipment Guide should both include an "availability" value that tells you how widely available the weapon was. Can you check that and include the info in the "History" section somewhere? ~SavageBOB sig 02:34, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
    • Addressed. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 21:23, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:18, September 30, 2011 (UTC)