Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Vocatara

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Vocatara

  • Nominated by: Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 05:54, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: My contribution to the barn-burner...

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. When I see rocket jumper in this article I automaticaly think of the TF2 soldier. Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 21:14, December 17, 2012 (UTC)
  2. 501st dogma(talk) 16:25, December 18, 2012 (UTC)
  3. —Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 06:18, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
  4. ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 03:32, December 26, 2012 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:43, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote Menkooroo (talk) 08:13, January 7, 2013 (UTC)

Object

CC-8
  • This is fairly nitpicky (as are a lot of things with me) but the bit where it says he became a politician like other rocket jumpers makes it seem like heaps of rocket jumper did, when looking at the rocket-jumper article there are only three known ones and only one other one became a politician. I'd consider removing that bit. Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 09:42, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
    • I changed it to say that several rocket-jumpers went on to become politicians, which goes along with what Galaxy at War says. It mentions Vocatara and another individual by name, but says that there were others.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 16:58, December 17, 2012 (UTC)
501
  • The first bit of the bio is sourced to the 2nd reference twice in a row.
  • In the 2nd sentence of the intro you use "known" twice. Could you change that up?
  • Otherwise, looks fine. 501st dogma(talk) 21:03, December 17, 2012 (UTC)
502
  • Great work. Just a couple: I always advise against adding "formerly" to any affiliation in the infobox, as infoboxes are supposed to represent an individual's entire life rather than the latest point in the timeline that we see them. Giving every era equal weight and not using a disclaimer at all is, I think, the best way to go about it.
  • Also, if the Republic Army gets some bulleted love in the infobox, could either Galactic Senate or Office of the Supreme Chancellor get in there too? Seems incomplete to list his military affiliation but not his political one. Menkooroo (talk) 04:03, January 7, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:09, January 8, 2013 (UTC)


  • Not an objection, but may I ask what's going on with the CSWE template in the Sources list in editing view? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:43, December 29, 2012 (UTC)