Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Vob Bitas (second nomination)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Vob Bitas

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 19:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Restored FGA; it really was only killed for a sole point (lmao) but did the other necessary modernization.
  • Date Archived: 04:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 461 words (77 introduction, 213 body, 171 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 461 words (77 introduction, 213 body, 171 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 04:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Fan26 (Talk) 02:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
  3. Xd1358 (Talk) 19:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
  4. Booply (talk) 02:36, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Object

Ecks
  • Is there a reason for the non-ascending order of the references sourcing the tuckerization in the Bts? And the second Bts paragraph cites just one source but contains two separate refs. Xd1358 (Talk) 18:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
    • Not in particular; both were holdovers from removing other irrelevant stuff from the BtS. Should be sorted.—spookywillowwtalk 18:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)