Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified new dreadnought

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified new dreadnought

• Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:50, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I blinked and suddenly this was written up
• Date Archived: 23:08, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
• Final word count: 384 words (68 introduction, 303 body, 13 behind the scenes)
• Word count at nomination time: 374 words (69 introduction, 305 body, 0 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Ambition

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

1. —spookywilloww^talk 00:11, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
2. Lewisr (talk) 17:40, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
3. CometSmudge (talk) 03:02, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
4. Xd1358 ^(Talk) 20:12, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
5. Booply (talk) 22:52, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

spookly

• The article should have a BTS.—spookywilloww^talk 23:31, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Oh that is— a big issue! Fixed! Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:11, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Lew

• The type in the infobox should be filled in, and Category:Dreadnoughts added Lewisr (talk) 00:17, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
• I think Krennic says it would have more firepower than 10 vessels of the dreadnought's size, rather than ships 10 times its size Lewisr (talk) 00:17, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
  • All added! Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:17, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Ecks

• The two consecutive sentences in the intro that contain a "clause A, however, clause B" makes for a bit of an awkward read. Maybe reword one of the instances. Xd1358 ^(Talk) 18:43, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Addressed Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:15, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)