Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified gundark nest

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified gundark nest

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 00:32, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:00, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Menkooroo (talk) 04:22, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Good work, CP. Winterz (talk) 16:13, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 06:04, December 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object

El Jefe
Gund-ark
  • The opening sentence of the intro: "A nest was the home of the gundarks, a non-sentient predatory species, that lived on the moon Alaris Prime." This reads like a dictionary definition of the word "nest." Can you re-word it so that it's clearly talking about this particular nest?
  • The sentence beginning with "The Wookiees, on advice from Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn..." is pretty long and run-on with a lot of commas. Can you split it up? Menkooroo (talk) 03:09, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
Wiz
  • May I ask how was the nest "featured" in the sequel? You can also clarify that in the respective section. Winterz (talk) 23:33, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
    • Voila. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:25, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
    • Actually that's not exactly what I asked. I understand that it was featured in the second game, but how? I mean, it was destroyed, so what exactly is its part in the game?
      • Ah wait, I get it. The player can repeat the mission with the expansion right? I was a bit confused. Winterz (talk) 17:57, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • Also, Gundarks should be removed from affiliation as they're not an organization per se.
  • The Gundarks are referred to as non-sentient in the article yet in Gundark's article they're mentioned as semi-sentient. If they are indeed mentioned as non-sentient in the game, then we have two sources contradicting themselves and this needs to be explained in a reference. Winterz (talk) 18:04, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 06:04, December 27, 2013 (UTC)


  • I've got more of a question on notability here... should this article exist? I'm just not positive that a nest for non-sentient beings, let alone an unnamed nest is really hitting any great level of notability. I think it sets a bit of a disturbing precedent, really. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 03:38, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
    • I think its notable enough, the objective of the level is to attack the nest, and we've done articles for a lot less than this. Commander Code-8 You lost the game! 01:03, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
      • An objective of a level doesn't denote notability. If it did, then "water tank 4" from TOR would be notable or some such. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 01:13, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
        • I think it's notable enough, being the only nest on the moon, and being the last line of defense between the gundarks on the moon and extinction. Menkooroo (talk) 03:12, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
        • It's a mentioned location so that makes it notable enough. Winterz (talk) 23:30, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • Hey folks, I figured I would take this over for Code-8. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 01:25, December 16, 2013 (UTC)