- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Unidentified Zabrak patron
- Nominated by: NaruHina Talk
17:32, April 24, 2011 (UTC) - Nomination comments: The opening quote made Trak squee.
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
After brief IRC-review Kilson(Let's have a chat) 00:28, April 25, 2011 (UTC)- Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:38, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Pre-nom. MasterFred
(Whatever) 17:36, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
Sing = priceless. CC7567 (talk) 07:48, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:03, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
Object
Lee attacks
Maybe add another sentence before the fact the first sentence in the bio. Something like: ... was a ... who lived during... Shortly after, the Zabrak was drinking.... ?No quote for the bio?- Otherwise nice. What a pervert. Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:45, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
I'm not sure if bolding "patron" in the intro is appropriate, seeing as the article itself is titled "Zabrak"? Perhaps rename the article to "Zabrak patron" or just bold "Zabrak"?1358 (Talk) 18:28, April 25, 2011 (UTC)- "Patron" is bolded because that is his title, or lack thereof. It's the same thing as bolding something like "individual" in a case where there are no specifics about the character. While I don't really think the name change is necessary (still can't spell that correctly >.<), I'll do it if you insist. NaruHina Talk
21:17, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
- "Patron" is bolded because that is his title, or lack thereof. It's the same thing as bolding something like "individual" in a case where there are no specifics about the character. While I don't really think the name change is necessary (still can't spell that correctly >.<), I'll do it if you insist. NaruHina Talk
Toprawa
If and until there are ever plural articles corresponding to Unidentified Zabrak patron, it's unnecessary for this article title to include the parenthetical descriptor. This article should be moved to that title for now.Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:36, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:03, May 9, 2011 (UTC)