Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified Tusken Raider guard

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified Tusken Raider guard

  • Nominated by: Stake black msg 21:01, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 11:32, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 936 words (88 introduction, 482 body, 366 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 946 words (92 introduction, 477 body, 377 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:VISIONS

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ACvote CometSmudge (talk) 17:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 00:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 07:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  4. Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 03:03, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
  5. ACvote OOM 224 11:31, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comet
  • The first behind the scenes section should have a header
  • The conception and design section has room for an image
  • I think the image in skills and abilities would be more relevant in Cover blown or Equipment, which both have more room to fit the image
  • There's a couple instances where the article uses he/him pronouns for the Tusken, is that accurate or should those be changed?
  • I think this and all the other guards should have their type as Bounty hunter in the infobox CometSmudge (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
    • I've made some changes. Stake black msg 23:30, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
      • I don't think skills and abilities has room for an image, especially since it's pushing away the next subheader CometSmudge (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
        • I've improved the layout of the images. Stake black msg 12:12, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
  • A New Hope should have a release year CometSmudge (talk) 02:16, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 11:31, 15 November 2025 (UTC)