Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified Munificent-class star frigate (Patitite Pattuna)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified Munificent-class star frigate (Patitite Pattuna)

Why do you refer to the other ship in the article simply as "Munificent?" I believe that should be changed to "Munificent-class star frigate."
- Changed. TK 999 10:23, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
On that same note, I think that other Munificent-class star frigate should get its own article.
- Filling in. TK 999 10:23, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
~~You should list the full battle name in the History, rather than pipelinking it with just showing "attack."~~
- On second look, the Battle of Patitite Pattuna article has a {{Conjecture}} template on it. So the intro needs to be changed accordingly.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 23:20, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
The fact that Adi Gallia's ship was destroyed needs to be mentioned in the History, as you state in the intro.
- Added. TK 999 10:23, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
That's all for now.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 23:18, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review so far. TK 999 10:23, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

~~Link for the "Corporate Union" in the intro.~~
- They're the Confederacy. TK 999 10:23, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
during the galactic conflict called the Clone Wars: As the Clone Wars were not "the" only galactic conflict, please change this.
- Changed. TK 999 10:23, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
Per my count, the article is at 200 words and therefore way to short for the GAN. Also, you should cut down the intro as it is more than the body. Clone Commander Lee ^Talk 09:41, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

Nomination removed per nominator's request. JangFett ^(Talk) 18:00, February 18, 2012 (UTC)

Idle objection for over a month now. I left a message on TK's talk page about it, but he has yet to respond there or here.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 15:05, February 17, 2012 (UTC)