- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Unidentified Human barfly
- Nominated by: graestan(talk) 20:11, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Too long, yet again.
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
JangFett (Talk) 03:48, February 3, 2012 (UTC)- Awful pick-up lines for the win. Trak Nar Ramble on 05:20, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Assuming Cal Jedi is satisfied. Hanzo Hasashi 05:23, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
I find this article's midi-chlorian count adequate. 1358 (Talk) 18:42, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
Well, Grae said she wanted a date. I asked. No. She wanted some worthless bounty hunter....—Cal Jedi(Personal Comm Channel) 05:17, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
Object
God awful dialogue
Since the title is conjecture, could you please bold a statement that reflects her name in the intro? I.e, a young Human or something of that sort?- The things we miss when rusty. Got it. graestan(talk) 21:34, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
Infobox: Was there proof or anything said that claims she was a criminal? I don't actually recall this.Could you please source the TCW episode's airdate? IIRC, IMDB or the Star Wars calendar on the official site lists it. The episode guides are now useless. JangFett (Talk) 21:12, February 1, 2012 (UTC)- Just to let you know, Grae, we source any TCW event to the Star Wars Annual 2011 magazine. That magazine does list various battles taking place in 21 BBY, but if it's not confirmed, any "around 21 BBY" is sourced to it. I took care of this in the article for you, though. :) JangFett (Talk) 21:10, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
Return of the Jedi
You should probably add who she was talking to in her quotes, especially the first one.No quote for the P & T? From the way the article sounds, she had more than two quotes.—Cal Jedi(Personal Comm Channel) 22:06, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
- One more quote: "What's the big deal?" I decided against adding this to the article because it would require more lines from Hardeen or explanation in the attribution, which is goofy on a tiny article like this where you can read what was said easily without searching. graestan(talk) 05:12, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 05:18, February 11, 2012 (UTC)