- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Unidentified Dulok cub 2
- Nominated by: ~Savage
03:55, October 13, 2011 (UTC) - Nomination comments: Dewie to Gorneesh's Scrooge in Dulok Tales. ~Savage 03:55, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
Support
- --Cal Jedi
(Personal Comm Channel) 23:32, October 15, 2011 (UTC) 
Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 11:14, October 18, 2011 (UTC)- --Eyrezer 07:35, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:25, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
- 1358 (Talk) 00:27, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
Object
Just a small one, Mr. Dulok
The first sentence of the intro doesn't seem to make much sense. I'm not sure if you intended to make that two sentences, or if you were just trying to fit too much into one sentence. Either way, please try and make it more clearer.- Looks good, though.--Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 23:14, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. How's the intro look now? ~Savage 12:31, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Yup. Looks good.--Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 23:31, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Yup. Looks good.--Cal Jedi
- Thanks for the review. How's the intro look now? ~Savage
Toprawa
I'm not sure the word "concurrent" is really working appropriately here. Maybe something like "in accordance with," etc? "She had already developed physical features concurrent with those of her species..."Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:42, November 16, 2011 (UTC)- Whoops; I think that was supposed to be "consistent." :) Thanks for the review. I've done a slight revert on the image sizes to allow user preferences to take effect; let me know if there's some policy this violates, though. ~Savage 20:10, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
- May I ask what this means, to allow "user preferences" to take effect? Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:50, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Sure: when you go to "my preferences," click "Appearance," and there's an option for "thumbnail size." This allows the (logged-in) user to select the default image size for any image left to "thumb" with no hard pixel size specified. I have mine set at 250 px, but it's customizable. It may be that we want to designate a site-wide default image size, but my personal opinion is that we shouldn't, since it overrides user preferences in this way. Hopefully that makes sense! ~Savage 21:20, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting. I did not know that feature existed. Very well, then. I do believe there is some merit in standardizing our overall wiki appearance, and to that point there have been basic discussions in the past regarding establishing an "official" resolution size, etc., but that's something for another day. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:25, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Sure: when you go to "my preferences," click "Appearance," and there's an option for "thumbnail size." This allows the (logged-in) user to select the default image size for any image left to "thumb" with no hard pixel size specified. I have mine set at 250 px, but it's customizable. It may be that we want to designate a site-wide default image size, but my personal opinion is that we shouldn't, since it overrides user preferences in this way. Hopefully that makes sense! ~Savage
- May I ask what this means, to allow "user preferences" to take effect? Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:50, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Whoops; I think that was supposed to be "consistent." :) Thanks for the review. I've done a slight revert on the image sizes to allow user preferences to take effect; let me know if there's some policy this violates, though. ~Savage
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:27, November 20, 2011 (UTC)