- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Tyzen Xebec
- Nominated by: JangFett (Talk) 22:18, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: TCW's second Padawan. I have to admit, it's good to get away from clone articles. :P
(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
Object
- From the guy who wrote his master's article...
- In the intro you say he accompanied his master into battle, but then you say he was with Ganch. He was never with his master during the battle of Devaron, so that would be incorrect.
- The general wording and chronology of the battle in the intro's first paragraph is both messy and incorrect. It needs a complete overhaul.
- "Braces" of what and stream of water from where? This makes no sense as it stands now.
- There's no indication that those were Xebec's quarters in the latest release.
- Intro's second paragraph is similarily sloppy. It needs a rewording and reworking.
- You say the red alert caused panic, but that's never seen in the comic.
- There's a whole bunch of other stuff that you're going to have to get from me on the IRC.
- Darth Trayus
(Trayus Academy) 05:48, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Jang, I really do not see the point in nominating Xebec at this time. This is not going to be a pleasant nomination process for either you or the reviewers; you're going to have to update this article every single week until the comic is finished, and in light of future edits that you will have to make, a review given at any point in time during the nomination process is no guarantee that the article will keep the quality of writing that the reviews achieve. Even if and when the article is passed, the ACs will have to constantly get on your case to update the article. That is going to be the case no matter how diligent you believe yourself to be. The subject's lack of stability is even worse than Cad Bane, and I did not have the best time constantly updating him either. The fact that you wrote this in one day does not reflect well on the depth of thought that you gave to what it will take to maintain this article, and judging from Trayus's objections, it still has a long way to go in terms of both writing and factual correctness. Please consider taking this down and renominating this after the web comic is done. If not, we as the ACs will remove it ourselves for the article's almost complete failure to meet Rule 5, at the very least. CC7567 (talk) 04:41, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to have to agree with CC on this Jang. After giving it one review and seeing your actions in response, (which are objectionable themselves) I'd suggest that you take on a more stable article. If you were to go though with this one, I can see it sitting on the GAN for several months, much like Bast. Darth Trayus (Trayus Academy) 05:27, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to have to agree with CC on this Jang. After giving it one review and seeing your actions in response, (which are objectionable themselves) I'd suggest that you take on a more stable article. If you were to go though with this one, I can see it sitting on the GAN for several months, much like Bast. Darth Trayus
Comments
- Removed per nominator's request.