Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Tik

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Tik
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Yay! More Vong noms FTW
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Tik

  • Nominated by: Menkooroo (talk) 13:59, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A Rogue. Also, the precursor to Dogma's nom.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 00:41, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 02:43, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:06, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 15:35, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 21:24, December 19, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Yay! More Vong noms FTW
  • "...in the year 25.2 ABY." (Intro and body) I'm not liking the sound of it. Maybe take the year part out, and just leave 25.2 ABY? It's just a suggestion, however. In the body, you could probably omit the .2 part when you initially say it, as you have it mentioned as 25.2 shortly after it.
    • Yeah, that does read a little oddly. Suggestions taken; check it out.
  • Good work. If your death date for Capstan is correct, I might have to change her article's to 25.3 ABY. 501st dogma(talk) 23:55, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thank ya, thank ya. Yeah, the NEC is really specific with dates for each NJO book. Which means that the ages given for the Solo kids throughout theseries are consistently a year or two too high. Menkooroo (talk) 02:52, November 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:32, December 19, 2013 (UTC)