Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/The Wolf

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

The Wolf

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 11:28, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Why is he even there?

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 22:12, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
  2. 501st dogma(talk) 23:31, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
  3. --Emperor Jarjarkine GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Senate Hall 01:47, June 14, 2014 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:57, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
  5. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 20:57, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
  6. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:12, June 24, 2014 (UTC)

Object

  • Great to see you! Why is there a NOTOC? Clone Commander Lee Talk 11:30, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
    • It's related to my below comment regarding the intro/biography. Having a TOC that started from the P&T seemed weird. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 11:38, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
      • Disregard that. It's been removed now. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 12:35, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
501st
  • I don't believe we should call the player character a spacer. In TOR noms, when one can't identify who killed/completed something, individual is usually used. Otherwise, good work on this otherwise random mini-boss. :P 501st dogma(talk) 13:21, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
    • I just remember that we have been using the term "spacer" to refer to the player character in Galaxies, so that's why I used it. I haven't been following all the TOR content on the site that much, so I wasn't aware on how we approach it now. Addressed. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 20:49, May 12, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

  • Just a few things to point out prior to a review: you're missing a History or an Intro section currently. The two are sorta combined right now.
  • You should put {{GAnom}} at the top of the page 501st dogma(talk) 11:33, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
    • I just wanted to make a comment here, but you beat me to it. I've decided that the amount of information presented does not warrant having an intro and a history, since they would basically say the same thing. If you think it's that necessary, I will add it. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 11:36, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
      • Well, intros are required for GANs, so you'd best add one. It can be short, just a brief summary that he was on Hoth and got killed. 501st dogma(talk) 12:24, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
        • No, they are not always required. Point number 7: …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content. But whatever, I've added one. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 12:35, May 12, 2014 (UTC)
  • I think linking [[Limb/Legends|hands]] is rather questionable seeing as it's in the context of a idiom rather than the actual limb, though I won't object. 1358 (Talk) 20:57, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
  • Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:12, June 24, 2014 (UTC)