Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/The Clone Wars: Hunting the Hunters (Part III)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

The Clone Wars: Hunting the Hunters (Part III)

  • Nominated by: JangFett Talk 23:12, September 18, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I suppose so. :P

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. --Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:42, September 19, 2009 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 23:53, September 19, 2009 (UTC)
  3. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 09:49, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
  4. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 01:19, October 18, 2009 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Grunny (Talk) 14:37, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Lee has only one thing to say
    • Please add the second clone pilot to the character list.
      • I only see Cody and Torrent Four as the only two clones in the comic. If you saw another one, feel free to add it in the list, due to this falling under {{SoFixIt}}.
        • I mean the second clone who is shot down by the Vultures.
          • Addressed.
    • Overall, good work. --Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:08, September 19, 2009 (UTC)
  2. The Grand Master
    • Some major tense-shifting issues in the bonus-page info in the Plot Summary.
      • Bah, sorry man. I wasn't thinking properly and wrote it in past-tense. 9_9 Should be good now, hopefully.
    • Info about the bonus page should be added to the bts
      • Addressed and thanks for the review. :)
    • Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 20:58, September 19, 2009 (UTC)
    • Just one more: please add a just a little more info to the end of the intro about what happens in the comic. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 23:37, September 19, 2009 (UTC)
      • Addressed.
  3. Attack of the Clone
    • For now, I'm leaving this as a reminder of the article's OR issues I discussed with you over IRC on Sunday the 20th, UTC. Please fix this as soon as possible; you've been here long enough that I should not have to lecture you of all people about OR and fanon. CC7567 (talk) 03:50, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
      • CC, I completed all of your objections. If I had missed one, I'll talk to you on IRC tonight. I looked through the comic once again and I noticed you replaced something that made the sentence a factual error. JangFett Talk 15:24, September 26, 2009 (UTC)
        • Please note that my objection on the factual correctness of the article still remains. Jaybo's bit about the probe droids is still incorrectly placed, and I still recommend going back and reading the comic to check for factual correctness.
          • It should be correct now. I went back and did look at the comic, and it's correct.
            • No, it is not. Jaybo did not mention the earlier dispatched probe droids when he informed the Jedi about the Thicket. CC7567 (talk) 07:14, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
              • Addressed.
    • Your Bts needs some shaping up. Also, never use the word "you" in an article. Involving the reader in the article is unnecessary, and the term itself is also unspecific.
      • Addressed.
        • "If the player destroys and stops 3D": replay the game if you have to, but you need to be more specific than that. Also, unless I'm reading wrong, I was under the impression that you yourself stated earlier in the summary that the Jedi found the inanimate "shell" of 3D, but that the droid wasn't "destroyed"—as you're now saying. CC7567 (talk) 07:14, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
          • Fixed the issue with the game information.
    • "In the comic, Anakin Skywalker and Obi-Wan Kenobi return to Iego to find out that IG-86 sentinel droid, HELIOS-3D, is controlling a part of Iego space called the "Thicket." Please clarify why a reiteration of the plot is necessary. CC7567 (talk) 20:55, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
      • Per other TCW-related OOU comic GAs, this is exact format that is in use, CC. However, I'll remove it because I see that it has no meaning in the BtS.
        • If you're going to use the other comics as precedents, this is going to have to be worded differently. Stating what the comic explained or established (which is fit to do, in this case) is not the same as a plain plot reiteration that sounds like it was copied and shortened from the intro. CC7567 (talk) 07:14, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
          • Addressed.
  4. Per rule 8, there must be no redlinks in any templates and there is currently a redlink in {{The Clone Wars episodes}}. Other than that, good work. Grunny (Talk) 14:29, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

  • Also, please note that the link to this comic (as with every other comic-related article) no longer works with the recent reorganization and restructure. This needs to be fixed. CC7567 (talk) 07:23, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:37, October 18, 2009 (UTC)