Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Tera Sinube's sabercane

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Tera Sinube's sabercane

  • Nominated by: —Tommy 9281 21:55, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I cannot even begin to explain the irony of this nomination…

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Now that all of my stuff has been addressed. CC7567 (talk) 22:05, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:06, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  3. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 00:42, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Great work. JangFett (Talk) 01:33, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  5. In full support of Jedi Columbo's weapon of choice. Great work, Tommy.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 05:28, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 23:24, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Object

3to 9281: Come in, over.
  • Just one: I think the lightsaber colour should be in the Description instead of the History.
  • Otherwise, a very well written and interesting article =) SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 05:45, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
    • Addressed. Thanks for the review, Soresu. Please advise if anything further is required.—Tommy 9281 14:25, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
Fett
  • The second paragraph in the description section doesn't describe or have any relevance to Sinbue's sabercane. I haven't seen anything in sources saying Sinube's sabercane has those things described in the first few sentences of the second paragraph. Is it possible to cut it down some or perhaps have Sinube's sabercane mentioned?
    • I would ask that you take notice of the first two sentences of the "Advantages" section of the Lumiya's lightwhip article: "The more common lightwhip was already a rare and exotic weapon, and its solitary, flexible, energy appendage—while less powerful than a lightsaber—was an unfamiliar occurrence among traditional lightsaber adepts. Because of this, lightwhip masters usually enjoyed a considerable amount of leverage over their foes." As it is with Sinube's sabercane, those sentences describe the differences between the traditional use of the subject in question, and then lead to the following sentince which, in both articles, goes on to explain the unique nature of the weapon and its connection with its wielder. I respectfully ask that you reconsider your opinion on this matter.—Tommy 9281 18:23, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
      • Thanks for pointing this out, Tommy. JangFett (Talk) 01:33, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Other than that, very well done. :) I'm sorry I couldn't give it a pre-nom review before its nomination. 14:11, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review Jang, and no worries about the pre-nom. I appreciate and am honored by your input no matter when it is received. Please advise if anything further is required.—Tommy 9281 18:23, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 01:07, August 27, 2010 (UTC)