Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Tector-class Star Destroyer

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Tector-class Star Destroyer
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Fred strikes back
        • 1.1.2.2 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Tector-class Star Destroyer

  • Nominated by: —Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 21:57, February 22, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Original.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 15:27, February 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks for your review Vitus!—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 17:27, February 23, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ACvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 21:33, March 30, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:44, April 10, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 16:21, April 11, 2018 (UTC)
  5. --Lewisr (talk) 16:27, April 11, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Fred strikes back
  • It should be mentioned in the "Characteristics" section that the ship is hangarless. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 20:42, March 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done.Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 20:49, March 29, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • A few preliminaries. Firstly, "hangarless" isn't a word. You will need to revise this in all instances, unless it's part of a direct quote.
    • Done.
  • As with my objection on Victory-class, the fact that this ship served with the Imperial Navy isn't really relevant to its Characteristics section. You should work that term into the History if you want to keep it in the article.
    • Done.
  • I don't know what ref 6 is doing, but that should be using the old SW.com template to cite message board posts, including the original link to that post. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:11, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
    • Currently searching, Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:33, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
      • Done. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 20:52, April 3, 2018 (UTC)
  • Going along with my objections on Victory-class, the Characteristics section here doesn't really need to mention that this Star Destroyer has a long, angled, gray hull. All Star Destroyers by definition have long, angled, gray hulls. By virtue of calling it a Star Destroyer, you're already effectively achieving that detail.
    • Done.
  • Galactic Atlas alone cannot be used to date-reference the events of "Levers of Power." You will need to use a manual reference note. Something like "Star Wars: Galactic Atlas dates the Battle of Endor, the events of which appear in the short story "The Levers of Power," to 4 ABY."
    • Done.
  • You need to fully reference the first BTS paragraph. Don't rely on the tweet for that whole paragraph. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:11, April 10, 2018 (UTC)
    • Sorry I really should've noticed that. Ref'd. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:22, April 10, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 16:30, April 11, 2018 (UTC)


  • Nominated here [1].—Tommy-Macaroni Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 07:25, February 23, 2018 (UTC)