Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Tal Nami (species)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Tal Nami (species)
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Princess
        • 1.1.2.2 Savaged…
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Tal Nami (species)

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:46, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:Third Barn burner species nom

(3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Looks good. 501st dogma(talk) 00:00, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
  2. - Princess GLG 13:08, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 23:39, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ~SavageBOB sig 19:37, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
  5. --Eyrezer (talk) 00:51, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 14:50, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
  7. ACvote JangFett (Talk) 18:08, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Princess
  • Please check your linking. There are several things you have missed linking to.
    • Think I got them all. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:53, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
      • Root actually links to some guy, so that doesn't need to be linked. Limb should actually link to feet as it occurs in the article before hands. Trader can be linked to merchant, and foodstuff can be linked. - Princess GLG 19:04, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
        • Wow didn't realise so many common terms had pages. Fixed them all. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:44, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
          • Root is still linked in the infobox. Otherwise, looks good. - Princess GLG 11:50, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
            • Ah woops now gone. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:08, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
  • Shroud needs italicized as it is a ship. Galaxy of Fear: City of the Dead needs italicized in the Bts. - Princess GLG 11:07, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
    • Fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:53, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
Savaged…
  • Just one thing. You describe the hypothetical victim of the Tal Nami's execution with the word his. Do we know they had the male sex, then? If not, I'd replace the his with the. ~SavageBOB sig 13:27, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
    • Changed as you suggested. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:13, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:08, May 25, 2013 (UTC)