- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Super Star Destroyer (0)
Support
- Unit 8311 12:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- VT-16 08:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Because I hate the term Star Dreadnought (I spell the word "dreadnaught"), I hate Curtis Saxton, and I like the correct term being an article, even if it isn't precisely what I want to read. - Graestan 19:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Kilson 10:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
- Frabby 14:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC) (see comments for reasons)
- Sources are great, but too many redlinks. Jediknight19bby 16:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- What redlinks? The only redlink I see in the article is in the sources bit. Unit 8311 12:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- user:DarthJawa
Comments
- Several images need to be sourced, other than that the article looks great. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 12:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- I am quite surprised by this suggestion, as I feel the article really needs a serious rework and should in fact get a "Sorry about the mess" tag instead. It does not at all appear "wholesome" or concise, but rather as a patchwork of the compromises of several heated arguments about content to me. Following up on my initial contribution idea on the "combat performance" I am currently preparing a proposal for a complete rewrite of the article. Frabby 14:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sourced the images and the quote. Darth Seth (Imperial Lieutenant) 17:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Don't see why not, the article contains an exhaustive amount of official references, usually reserved for main character articles. As for combat performance, if there's a problem with their depiction in games, it can either be left out or rewritten. I personally see no official depictions of them as weak or with poor performance, and agree that the section could need some tweaking. Also noted that the portion about its size being connected to command facilities is a bit misleading. Command ships don't require that big a size to coordinate fleets (see Thrawn's command ship for instance), only to deliver more firepower, as noted in Starship Battles Preview 1. That could also do with some changing. VT-16 08:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hey guys, the apperances need work on. I've been cleaning them up for the past 4 days now and their really improved, but I think I'm missing a few. Kilson 10:59, 17 July 2007 (2007)