Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Subjugation of Charis

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Subjugation of Charis

  • Nominated by: Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 14:02, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: 300 words. DarkStryder related. Still be kind.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. -- 1358 (Talk) 11:13, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:50, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Grunny (talk) 11:31, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ~ SavageBob 14:10, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 16:16, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Xd has only one minor thing
  • If the title is conjectural, then "subjugation" should not be capitalized in the intro.
    • Decapped.
  • Otherwise, nice work. -- 1358 (Talk) 07:38, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
Graestan
  • This is going to sound insane, but shouldn't Charis's preceding uprising against the Empire be given a link and perhaps an article, as well? I'd jump on it myself, but I'd rather let someone with the source material handle it instead of writing an article using the Wook as a source. Graestan(Talk) 00:26, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
    • I'd be inclined to say no since the uprising and the subjugation are part of the same event. The way the source reads is that the uprising occurred, and then it was swiftly put down in a short space of time. The uprising was the precipitating event of the subjugation. But, if you feel strongly about it, there's no problem creating the page and linking to it :) - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 07:47, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
      • If they're parts of the same, wouldn't an overarching article with a different name be more appropriate? Graestan(Talk) 21:39, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
        • Possibly, yes. At the moment I'm thinking of either Charis uprising, Charis rebellion or Charis revolution/revolt. The source uses the terms uprising and revolt explicitly. Any suggestions or preference? - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 11:03, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Objection/question: The Aftermath section ends on quite a cliffhanger. Did they ever get NR support and stage the second uprising? I feel like that section is craving resolution. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:22, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
    • The source doesn't state anything. I think it's in there so that gamesmasters and players can use it as an adventure hook, but it doesn't specifically state that. Usually, adventure hooks are contained within their own little "Adventure Hook" box, but this isn't. It's just in the planet bio. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 08:39, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
Jujiggum
  • Just one thing: could you mention somewhere in the body that the planet had 1 billion inhabitants? Right now this info is only in the intro. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 14:04, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
Prepare to be savaged...
  • Any reason not to combine "Prelude", "The subjugation", and "Aftermath" into a single "History" section? I tend to try to avoid one-paragraph sections whenever possible, and I think the three paragraphs of this article would flow together nicely under a single heading.
    • Force of habit, I suppose. Combined into one section.
  • Can you indicate who wrote the adventure in which the subjugation is recounted in BTS? ~ SavageBob 18:06, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
    • Added.
  • It appears that Charis has an entry in the CSWE. Does this entry not allude to the subjugation at all? Should CSWE be added to the sources? ~ SavageBob 18:07, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
    • Charis is only mentioned in the Kathol sector entry, and doesn't have its own entry. I've clarified the situation on the Charis article. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 09:25, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 16:16, September 1, 2010 (UTC)