Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Steergard

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Steergard

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 10:25, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Love how much of a running gag this location being mentioned became.
  • Date Archived: 14:59, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 729 words (138 introduction, 433 body, 158 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 663 words (130 introduction, 407 body, 126 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:AST

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 17:44, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 23:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
  3. StarWarsFan327 (talk) 11:40, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
  4. D MCCG D MCCG (chat) 16:42, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 14:59, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
  • Port Steergard should be noted in the description as a shared name, if not being treated as a place on Steergard Lewisr (talk) 19:55, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
  • I don't think Steergard is actually mentioned in "Sagrona Teema" Lewisr (talk) 19:55, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • Because Complete Locations, New Edition is being discussed alongside other 2025 media (What a Festive Evening and the Appendix) it should have its full date.
  • I think "on April 29 of that year," can technically be a bit confusing since its discussing two different years in the BTS overall now. maybe "the same year" instead, or just flat on using 2025 would be better, since what year is "that year" when having discussed two different years prior to it, y'know. The appendix one as the third 2025 entry would be more of a clear spot to say 'same year' than the Festive Evening bit IMO; as lower down.
  • This probably requires Imp input, and may neutralize some of the objections above regarding CL, but I'm fairly sure we don't usually BTS note "first depiction on a map" because it's not a true full depiction of the subject but rather just an abstract dot. At least, I'm able to find a healthy amount of status articles (even some of your own, like Freerock) that don't note this for the Galaxy Map, unless its the 1stm in which case 1stm just does get documented. Unless its been said that this is what we're shifting to (in which case everything else gets updated) but otherwise should be consistent.
  • There's room for a BTS image, maybe the cover of CL or the Andor season poster.
  • Is sitting in a maintenance category.—spookywillowwtalk 02:11, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
    • All addressed. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 09:37, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
      • Leaving a copy-edit note to say I've swapped the BTS image alignment to right; LG does call outright that alignment should generally shift back to right even if the preceding body image is also right-aligned for the first BTS image, with rare exception, due to aesthetic.—spookywillowwtalk 23:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Tommy
  • You are inconsistent with the capitalisation of supervisor. Could you please confirm and reformat as needed. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 08:46, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Comments

  • Noting this needs an update per the recent appendix, it was partially updated here but still needs further additions Lewisr (talk) 05:45, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:59, 20 July 2025 (UTC)