- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Star Wars: Empire at War
(-1)
Support
Oppose
- From a quick glance at the legal scratchpad of Atarumaster88
- Lots of things wrong with this. There's no plot summary, for one.
- Doesn't describe gameplay modes.
- Majority of the article is a list.
- No referencing at all.
- No development history section.
- Marginal coverage of review.
- Marginal coverage of development team, etc.
- This is a very ambitious project and I think you're going to have to overcome a lot of obstacles (namely me and other reviewers, to put it bluntly) before this hits GAN. Mega props if you can satisfy the requirements and do it. Atarumaster88
(Talk page) 20:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Maybe I'll just scrap the nomination. It's worth the trouble, but you do have a good point.JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- For one, I'd have to spend a lot of time for this; I'm writing a fanon and I'd rather spend time doing that.JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't have a major commitment to this site, although I love it.JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- What is that you say?JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Give me three good ones on why I shouldn't screw the whole thing. I can come up with one.JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Your going to contribute greatly! It is worth the trouble. JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Is it too much to ask to get signature on these statements? Is it too much to ask to for the nominator to support the article as well?—Tommy
(There are no Jedi here) 22:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
JadenKorr13 03:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)