Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Stang (individual)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Stang (individual)
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support votes
      • 1.1.2 Objections
        • 1.1.2.1 Lew
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Stang (individual)

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 14:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Didn't quite stand a chance when Andor came in on that TIE.
  • Date Archived: 04:53, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 855 words (142 introduction, 636 body, 77 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 798 words (144 introduction, 588 body, 66 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 01:05, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 22:53, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
  4. Booply (talk) 02:22, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 04:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
  • The filming location for the Mina-Rau field scenes is known per this article and should be noted in the BTS Lewisr (talk) 04:58, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
    • Ignore the top line, it seems it should look more like what's on Aneth Lewisr (talk) 19:37, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
      • How's that? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 20:21, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
  • An equipment section is needed Lewisr (talk) 17:34, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
    • Sorted. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 18:51, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments

  • Copy-edit—I have objected this on quite a few of yours in the past and it was removed, due to lack of referential need. I've been copy-editing it out of this round of GANs as well, but it would be ideal if it simply wasn't re-added for future noms to avoid doing this, as the reasoning behind the objections still stands for each of these (and still aligns with current precedent and standards, etc.)—spookywillowwtalk 01:05, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)