Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Sith lightsaber/Canon

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Sith lightsaber

The page currently has a stub template, which means that the page is currently incomplete. It definitely lacks a history section.
- Will do. Darth Tomotron (talk) 05:08, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
  - I've done a history section. Darth Tomotron (talk) 06:07, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
Are you certain you have gotten all the sources that mention Sith lightsaber? I notice that Ultimate Star Wars was added, so I'd definitely check others in case you missed a mention
The fact that the page currently has /Canon in it violates point 16 on Wookieepedia:Good article nominations. So you'll need to get Sith lightsaber moved to Sith lightsaber/Legends and then this eventually to just Sith lightsaber --Lewisr (talk) 03:58, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, I can't do any thing about that. Darth Tomotron (talk) 05:08, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
  - Yeah no worries --Lewisr (talk) 11:02, September 12, 2019 (UTC)

First of all, I would like to tell you that all your good-faith contributions are very much appreciated, and you did a pretty good job by creating and expanding this article. However, per the reasons I'll get into in a bit, this article will never be eligible for Good article status. As stated here, we expect all our status articles to be comprehensively detailed, and this article is simply a summary of the subject, and I'm sure that Sith lightsabers appeared in more than just four canon reference books. For a subject that appears in a wide range of Star Wars media such as Sith lightsabers, even if this article was completely comprehensive, the article would certainly pass 1000 words, and thus be ineligible for GA status. Above all, as Sith lightsabers will certainly keep appearing in upcoming comics, novels, video games etc., this article will never meet rule #6: An article must be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day. Therefore, I suggest you to allow us take the nomination down in everyone's best interests. If you have any questions, even not related to this nomination, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:36, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
- I've decided I'm going to withdraw this page. Thank you Darth Tomotron (talk) 22:45, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
  - We will remove the nomination shortly. Thank you for your understanding. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:47, September 12, 2019 (UTC)