Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Siege of Mandalore

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Siege of Mandalore
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/5 Users/8 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Siege of Mandalore

  • Nominated by: CC7567 (talk) 02:29, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The end that might have been. Minor spoiler for "The Protector of Concord Dawn."

(3 ACs/5 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. --Alientraveller (talk) 02:49, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  2. I think it's highly unlikely that this story will never be told, but without anything on the horizon, I don't have any concerns about GAN Rule 5. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 03:03, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 01:42, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 17:54, March 6, 2016 (UTC)
  5. AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:57, March 31, 2016 (UTC)
  6. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 21:29, May 7, 2016 (UTC)
  7. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 15:56, June 3, 2016 (UTC)
  8. Inqvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:16, June 5, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:16, June 5, 2016 (UTC)


  • Currently, this is the only article that we have regarding material from the many unfinished TCW episodes, since it's the only subject to be mentioned by an IU source. For clarification purposes, the article's IU sections only contain info that's confirmed in-universe, whereas info that's come from OOU sources but is unconfirmed IU-wise (such as the involvement of Bo-Katan and Maul, as well as the fact that the event would have more or less been concurrent with ROTS) is regulated to the Bts section. CC7567 (talk) 02:29, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm anticipating some concerns regarding whether the article is able to meet GAN Rule 5 (not changing significantly day to day). Lucasfilm has stated that it does not intend to release (or adapt) any more TCW material, so unless that changes, the article will remain as is. The only major additions would come when Rebels follows up on Maul or Mandalore, but the latter, at least, isn't confirmed to be in the near future. CC7567 (talk) 02:29, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  • Could we have a pic of Rex and Ahsoka closer to how they would've looked? I understand that's unlikely but I look at that photo and laugh thinking of tiny S1 Ahsoka on Mandalore. --Alientraveller (talk) 02:49, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
    • Replaced it with one from Season Three. I'd personally have preferred one from Season Four or afterward, but there simply aren't any good shots with just the two of them. CC7567 (talk) 03:37, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
  • You'll probably be aware of this by the time you see my comment, but Dave Filoni and Pablo Hidalgo revealed more information about this arc in light of "Twilight of the Apprentice." You can find that info on IGN and Rebels Recon. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 11:53, March 31, 2016 (UTC)
    • Already saw those. I'll update the article when I get the chance. CC7567 (talk) 21:25, March 31, 2016 (UTC)
      • Updated. CC7567 (talk) 21:54, March 31, 2016 (UTC)
      • Great, thanks. Also worth noting that the novel Ahsoka was announced today. It's possible the siege of Mandalore will be included or at the very least referenced with new info, so that's just something to think about for the future. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 03:06, April 1, 2016 (UTC)