- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Shayla Paige-Tarkin
- Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 12:42, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: In the context of the ongoing Fifth Barn-Burner.
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 01:58, December 31, 2012 (UTC)- Mattjorgdbb (talk) 04:52, January 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Cavalier One
(Squadron channel) 13:48, January 8, 2013 (UTC) - Winterz (talk) 17:01, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:33, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
Object
Floyd
"Totally unaware of the Chancellor's evil alter ego as Darth Sidious," Evil is definitely POV.- Changed to "Sith alter ego."
Any reason why she would be worried about Palpatine's health?- Nothing more than what is already said. He looks tired, and she must think the sleep deprivation is bad for him. --LelalMekha (talk) 01:49, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
Can we get an article, or at least a redlink, on the Trandoshan bounty hunter that attacked her?- Now you mention it, I realize he has a name, and I just forgot to include it my wording. Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 01:49, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Nicely done. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 01:33, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
Toprawa
Preliminaries: References 1 and 2 need to be sourced to something. They can't just provide information like that without attributing that info to something. Ref 5 is an example of how to do this.- Good point. Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 23:39, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
- I'm still not sure that solves it completely. Both references are still making statements that are not directly attributed to anything. For example, in Ref 1, "Paige-Tarkin belonged to the Tarkin family" could say "...belong to the Tarkin family, according to [source]." Same in Ref 2: "Although Paige-Tarkin's species was never specified, she was referred to as a member of the Tarkin family, according to source." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:18, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I guess that should do the trick, now. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:45, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Perfect. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:13, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I guess that should do the trick, now. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:45, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
- I'm still not sure that solves it completely. Both references are still making statements that are not directly attributed to anything. For example, in Ref 1, "Paige-Tarkin belonged to the Tarkin family" could say "...belong to the Tarkin family, according to [source]." Same in Ref 2: "Although Paige-Tarkin's species was never specified, she was referred to as a member of the Tarkin family, according to source." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:18, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Good point. Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 23:39, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
were Humans,
A sofixit objection, but something to be mindful of in the future: never, ever leave an unsourced "Unknown" anywhere in an article. There is currently one in the succession box. That should just be removed.Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:18, January 27, 2013 (UTC)- Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 23:39, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
Please reload the infobox.Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:18, January 30, 2013 (UTC)- Done. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:45, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
Per a recent Mofference decision, we now require that the title field in the Succession box be sourced as well.- Here you are. --LelalMekha (talk) 23:16, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
- For the first nomination of yours that I've read, I'm impressed. This is very well-written. Good work. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:13, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Why, thank you! --LelalMekha (talk) 23:16, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:33, January 30, 2013 (UTC)