Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Sev (Jedi)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Sev (Jedi)

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Pre-nom reviewed. —Master Jonathan New Jedi Order (Jedi Council Chambers) 01:48, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Clone Commander Lee Talk 09:09, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:44, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Dundee! Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:04, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
  5. -- 1358 (Talk) 18:59, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Grunny (talk) 08:23, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • Why not create an article for his Venator Star Destroyer?
  • I think calling the clone troopers' attempted execution of Sah "betrayal" is a little too POV. They were simply following orders. The clones, alternatively, would consider Sah to have betrayed them. Please de-POV this: "After the Jedi Master's death, the ARC trooper sent a detachment of clones to eliminate Sah, who survived his troops' betrayal."
  • We have a Hasbro citation template for toy line information. Please see the K-3PO source list as an example, and please add this item to the Source list of this article.
  • You might also strongly consider finding a way to use the BTS image in the infobox, since it's far more realistic than the comic panel. And yes, action figures and accessories such as this are canon. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:18, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
    • I askd JMAS about this, and he's working on it.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 08:51, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
      • Fine with me. I won't hold up my support for this nomination on this objection, but I do think that BTS image is the superior picture. If you can get a good version of it, that would probably be the best infobox choice. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:44, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • All images in the article must be properly sourced. "Hasbro" is not good enough for File:TAC08order666T22.jpg. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:33, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
    • I had thought that it was the uploader's responsibility to properly source an image. At any rate, it's sourced.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 08:51, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
      • FYI, this is your responsibility, per GAN Rule 11: have all quotes and images sourced. Now that you're a CAN reviewer as well, this should be something for you to look out for. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:23, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Not an objection, but please remember to add a {{1st}} and/or {{1stm}} tag to each article you write. You seem to have a habit of forgetting this.
    • Will do. I thought I did, but apparently not. Thanks for the review!—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 08:51, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
  • Notes: I'm almost shocked at how many poor little grammatical, wording, formatting, and linking errors I caught myself in my own copy-edit of this nomination, considering two people claim to have already read through this article. You pre-nom reviewers need to pay closer attention to what you're doing. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:18, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Xd1358
  • Is there an article for the planned attack on the Sep base?
    • No, and it's not known if it was executed. Should it get an article? I don't think it's necessary, since what we know about that has already been stated, and there'se just too little info to go on.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 20:33, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • That's all. Nice work. -- 1358 (Talk) 21:11, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 08:23, August 12, 2010 (UTC)