- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Seizure of the Seswenna sector
- Nominated by: Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 03:13, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Should maybe finish these up, I think.
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
Good stuff. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 15:16, December 8, 2010 (UTC)- 1358 (Talk) 10:15, December 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:01, December 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Very good. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 22:54, December 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Very nice, Dark Lord.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 00:36, December 12, 2010 (UTC)
Object
Jujiggum
I thought that since you linked the Sith military in the article body, it should be linked upon its mention in the intro, too. So just take care of that redlink and I'll support.Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 03:25, December 8, 2010 (UTC)- Done. The link was actually kind of an afterthought... I noticed we had an article for the Navy and Army, but not the military as a whole. Thanks for the check-up. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 08:17, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
Xd1358
The year is currently infobox/intro only.So is the Bothawui info.Shouldn't {{1stm}} be applied instead of {{Mo}}?Particular reason why the navigation template is before the references section? I though that rule only applied to succession boxes, that need to be sourced.1358 (Talk) 15:52, December 8, 2010 (UTC)- Done, done, and only because I believe, if I remember correctly, that I had been asked to do that previously on other noms. After checking all of the other status articles that included the template, it appears they also have it before N&R. Would you like for me to adjust them or are they cool? Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 06:08, December 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Nah, I'm fine. Did this comment, btw, address the 1stm/Mo issue, too, or was it only directed at the navigation template issue? :P 1358 (Talk) 17:38, December 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. All are taken care of now. And I've linked the battle and Bothawui itself, but I chose not to go into too much detail, as it's already covered in that article itself as well as the second battle's article as well. But I did give the results. Let me know what you think. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 08:18, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Nah, I'm fine. Did this comment, btw, address the 1stm/Mo issue, too, or was it only directed at the navigation template issue? :P 1358 (Talk) 17:38, December 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Done, done, and only because I believe, if I remember correctly, that I had been asked to do that previously on other noms. After checking all of the other status articles that included the template, it appears they also have it before N&R. Would you like for me to adjust them or are they cool? Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 06:08, December 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:26, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Not an objection, of course, but since you apparently can verify a source for the year article 3671 BBY, would you mind adding an Appearance/Source to that article? Part of WP:TSTWTYASBP. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:12, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Done, sir, and glad I could be of help. I hadn't really looked at the project page yet, but I'll do some browsing through and try to source/improve some of the other TOR year articles. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 05:58, December 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Awesome. Thanks. :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:10, December 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Done, sir, and glad I could be of help. I hadn't really looked at the project page yet, but I'll do some browsing through and try to source/improve some of the other TOR year articles. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 05:58, December 9, 2010 (UTC)