- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Seizure of the Minos Cluster
- Nominated by: Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 22:37, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:And another. This completes the events from Timeline 6: Onslaught of the Sith Empire!
(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
Support
- Nice JangFett (Talk) 00:08, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 01:39, October 18, 2011 (UTC)- Clone Commander Lee Talk 12:43, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Great. Just when I almost got WP:TOR's CAs up past the GAs, you had to do another Good Article. :P --Cal Jedi
(Personal Comm Channel) 14:10, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- I just can't help myself—you'll catch up soon! Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 04:50, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Cavalier One
(Squadron channel) 12:13, October 26, 2011 (UTC) - CC7567 (talk) 04:45, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
Object
Cav
Just one thing; in the intro, you state: The contention over the Minos Cluster continued until the war's end in 3,653 BBY which indicates that the Minos Cluster was in active conflict from the seizure until the end of the war. In the main body, though, you say At some point during the twenty-eight year-long Great Galactic War, the Minos Cluster once again became contested,, which indicates that there was some period where the Cluster wasn't contested. A minor inconsistency, but one that needs to be checked and rectified, I think.- Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 10:50, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Addressed. Thanks for the review! Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 17:59, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, now the intro says "shortly before" while the bio says "at some point". Still a little inconsistent. Can we lose the "shortly" in the intro, or do we need to define a shorter time frame in the bio? - Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 09:38, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Woopsie. Cut the "shortly." Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 04:50, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, now the intro says "shortly before" while the bio says "at some point". Still a little inconsistent. Can we lose the "shortly" in the intro, or do we need to define a shorter time frame in the bio? - Cavalier One
- Addressed. Thanks for the review! Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 17:59, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:45, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I'll try to find an image of the Minos Cluster from TEA to add at some point. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 22:37, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Question: Shouldn't there be an in-universe article for the timelines? Since it is presented as an IU holodocumentary, I think that each one should receive its own article. Thoughts?--Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 01:42, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to pop in, but: Behold! There was some discussion about whether or not each entry should get its own entry, but one article for 'em all seemed a bit less cumbersome. Although a move might be in order, as "in-universe" isn't an In-universe name... Menkooroo 04:20, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- It still seems like each one should receive its own page since we give individual pages to anything that we can. But since this discussion isn't really part of this article, I'll go ahead and support.--Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 14:10, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- It still seems like each one should receive its own page since we give individual pages to anything that we can. But since this discussion isn't really part of this article, I'll go ahead and support.--Cal Jedi
- Sorry to pop in, but: Behold! There was some discussion about whether or not each entry should get its own entry, but one article for 'em all seemed a bit less cumbersome. Although a move might be in order, as "in-universe" isn't an In-universe name... Menkooroo 04:20, October 19, 2011 (UTC)