Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Scourge (Victory I-class Star Destroyer)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Scourge (Victory I-class Star Destroyer)

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 12:29, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: One of my few TFOP noms that aren't from an adventure scenario

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 01:31, March 30, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 03:15, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 15:07, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Winterz (talk) 15:51, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 22:39, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Cav
  • Slight nitpick, but if we know its a Victory-I class, can the article name reflect that specifically? - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 09:48, April 12, 2013 (UTC)
    • Bah. There. Thanks for looking it over. 501st dogma(talk) 21:23, April 12, 2013 (UTC)
Harlem dat shake
  • All the technical details were given by the Far Orbit Project or did you assume that since it was a Victory-I class, and it would have those same specifications? Winterz (talk) 12:01, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
    • That's all from TFOP. 501st dogma(talk) 20:28, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
  • Can anything be added to the "role" field in the infobox? Command ship, destroyer, etc.?
    • There?
  • I think it would be worth expanding the intro maybe by a couple sentences or so; it looks a bit short in comparison to the rest of the article.
    • How's that?
  • I'm not too sure about the way that the History section ends, with the short clause about the Far Orbit having become a privateering vessel being tacked onto the last sentence. Is it absolutely necessary? If it's not entirely relevant to the Scourge itself, I would recommend omitting it.
    • Axed.
  • Please check the "adventure adea" in the Bts. CC7567 (talk) 23:41, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
    • Done, thanks for looking it over. 501st dogma(talk) 18:25, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 22:39, April 28, 2013 (UTC)