- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
S-Mine Detonator
- Nominated by: Wok142 (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Another one goes over
- Date Archived: 02:28, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Final word count: 491 words (82 introduction, 218 body, 191 behind the scenes)
- Word count at nomination time: 427 words (75 introduction, 193 body, 159 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:Rebels WP:Comics WP:Video Games Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Ambition
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
Lewisr (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
My first time reviewing an article with a concept art gallery in action 👀 OOM 224 18:02, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
—spookywillowwtalk 21:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)- --Vitus InfinitusTalk 03:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Booply (talk) 02:23, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Object
Dani
I think the BTS needs to be restructured to say was 1stIDed in these two articles on X date, which was a preview to its inclusion in SWGOH (originally released on Y date) on Z date. If that makes sense.Kit Reveal: Eighth Brother on the Star Wars Galaxy of Heroes Forums (original site is defunct) and
Developer Insights: Eighth Brother on the Star Wars Galaxy of Heroes Forums (original site is defunct) Both of these articles go in External Links NBDani
(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 19:15, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
There is some design bits relevant to the mines in the Developer Insights forum. NBDani(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 19:15, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Trailer needs a date. NBDani(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 21:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Lew
Think it'd be worth browsing through Eighth_Brother#Sources to just check incase of sources, I imagine most cases will be a Po but Star Wars: The Dark Side Pocket Expert for example does mention them, happy to help search any if you don't have access toLewisr (talk) 06:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Vitus
I'd include grenade in the infobox, as well as point out in the description that detonator was also classified as a grenade.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 02:43, 11 February 2025 (UTC)- Grenade has been added to the infobox. For the second point, do you mean explicitly state that? I think having the alternate name in there is sufficient. Otherwise I would be saying something along the lines of: "S-Mine Detonators, aka Photon Grenades, were disk-shaped explosives. The detonators, also classified as grenades, were handheld etc etc" so that feels a bit redundant. I at one point used grenades and detonators interchangeably when referring to them to sort of address this point, but I felt it could be potentially confusing. What do you think? Wok142 (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm, I suppose this is just a bit of a weird one, considering detonators and grenades are different types of devices. But then there's something like a thermal detonator, which functions like a grenade.... Honestly, thinking on it further, I think it's fine how you have it now. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 03:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Grenade has been added to the infobox. For the second point, do you mean explicitly state that? I think having the alternate name in there is sufficient. Otherwise I would be saying something along the lines of: "S-Mine Detonators, aka Photon Grenades, were disk-shaped explosives. The detonators, also classified as grenades, were handheld etc etc" so that feels a bit redundant. I at one point used grenades and detonators interchangeably when referring to them to sort of address this point, but I felt it could be potentially confusing. What do you think? Wok142 (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:27, 14 February 2025 (UTC)