Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Royal Crusader

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Royal Crusader
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Lee's charge
        • 1.1.2.2 Cav
        • 1.1.2.3 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Royal Crusader

  • Nominated by: MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 20:09, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Got too big for the CAN.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. A smooth turnover, n'est-ce pas? Corellian PremierRobotechAll along the watchtower 22:12, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Clone Commander Lee Talk 11:13, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 00:47, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
  4. ACvote—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 03:42, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:35, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Lee's charge
  • In the intro, you say that they "often" charged into enemy infantry, while in the bio you only say that they charged into infantry. Which one is correct?
    • Changed.
  • In battle, they rode on large, powerful guarlara steeds and charged into the heart of enemy infantry. They employed powerful melee weapons rather than blaster rifles, and they were outfitted at Security Force Fortresses. : Please find synonyms for two of the "they"s.
    • Yeah, that reads weird. Fixed.
  • The troops were unsuccessful and the Federation successfully conquered the city.: Could you replace one of the (un)successfull, it's make it hard to read otherwise.
    • Wow, must've missed that. Changed.
  • Plus: Do we know if these Crusaders were killed?
    • They were. Added.
  • Good job on an interesting article. Clone Commander Lee Talk 08:33, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 16:18, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
Cav
  • In the history section, there are sentences that follow each other reffed to the same source. Can you check these instances to make sure they are sourced correctly and if they are, to remove the unneeded duplicate refs? - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 12:02, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
    • Sourced.
  • Thanks for the review! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 12:45, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Is there a specific reason for capitalizing "Fortresses" here? "and were outfitted at Security Force Fortresses"
    • Hm, I guess not. lol Fixed.
  • Since the game's Prima Guide, which was apparently released one week prior to the game's release, is technically their first canonical mention, this deserves mention in the BTS. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:17, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
    • Mentioned.
  • Thanks for the review! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 14:44, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
    • Terribly sorry for the delay. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:35, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:35, March 17, 2012 (UTC)


Here is the CAN. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 20:09, February 19, 2012 (UTC)