Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Roko

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Roko

  • Nominated by: IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 02:55, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Yes, me again.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:43, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Okey, now it's Fnnbu, right? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:20, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:18, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote—Tommy 9281 00:42, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:57, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. Farlstendoiro is here too
    • Are redlinks allowed at all in infoboxes? Btw, something must be wrong because that article should exist
      • What are you talking about? No redlinks in the article.
        • It was '4000 BBY' instead of 4,001 BBY'
          • Oh, haha.
    • Anyway, if Roko died in 4,001 BBY, how could he be active in 4,000 BBY?
      • Fixed this one, if you don't mind. There was a comma missing. -- 1358 (Talk) 16:55, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
        • Besides, the events took place in 4,000 BBY.
    • Do we say "unidentified" in the text? I thought that word was reserved for cases in which something (i.e. a species) was unidentified in-universe.
      • Well, I don't see his species being identified anywhere. But addressed.
        • "Unidentified" still used in the intro.
          • Addressed.
    • Underlinking: At the very least, in the intro: "Enforcer One" and Gruna's hauler. Please review this.
      • Addressed.
    • Bio: Should Roko's prisoner have an article?
      • Created.
    • NPOV: "Their jubilance was short-lived" and "a fearsome ensemble". Short-lived and fearsome compared to what?
      • Why does it have to be compared to anything? Their jubilance was short-lived because the Enforcer One showed up right away and captured them. But I removed the "Fearsome" part.
    • Fnnbu is next, I hope.Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:21, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Jep, Lee attacks too
    • A second picture, possibly one of his death ? Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:45, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
      • Added. Sorry, but the picture's a bit small.
  3. :1829ymmoT
    • Finhead Stonebone's organization has an article of its own. I'd have fixed this for you, but you've missed it in several of your recent noms. Familiarize yourself, please.—Tommy 9281 01:14, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
      • Addressed.
  4. Few things.
    • "Roko's pirate gang" Don't you mean Stonehead's? Chack Jadson (Talk) 20:42, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
      • Eh, addressed.
    • "Roko was good friends with the pirate captain, although he referred to Stonebone respectfully as "cap'n"." How is the fact that he called him cap'n warranting an "although?" I mean, sure he didn't call him by his first name, but I think it's a bit OR to say that "he respectfully called him cap'n." Chack Jadson (Talk) 20:42, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Toprawa:
    • Same objection I left for you on your other nom regarding mentioning CSWE and SWE both in the BTS. It'd be nice if you could apply these things to your other articles as well, instead of just waiting until someone leaves an objection for it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:44, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 16:57, April 30, 2010 (UTC)