Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Rawk V99 blaster

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Rawk V99 blaster

  • Nominated by: Menkooroo 14:00, August 29, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I'm sorry, Kilson. I don't have the energy to finish viral spore. But here's that GAN you requested (with possibly more to come!).

(3 ACs/5 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Kilson(Let's have a chat) 14:55, August 30, 2011 (UTC)
  2. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 17:44, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
  3. --Talrrivanian JaingHead (Headquarters) 06:27, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 22:29, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ~SavageBOB sig 02:26, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
  6. I love Legacy weapons. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 02:31, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
  7. ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 04:03, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
  8. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 04:11, September 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Kilson
  • You seem to have the "model" and "type" Infobox fields a bit confused. Generally, one would put "blaster" in the type field because that's the type of weapon it is. Also, you should put V99 in the model field because that's the blaster's model. I hope that makes sense
    • I've been confused by these infoboxes all month. :P Thanks for the advice. Changed.
  • Due to that recent CT, you shouldn't fill in the "Owners" field of the Infobox.
    • Ah, right. Thanks.
  • Otherwise, good job. And don't worry about viral spores, I'm just happy you're willing to help out. Keep up the good work Menk. :) Kilson(Let's have a chat) 14:30, August 30, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks. You did it! Menkooroo 14:41, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:11, September 30, 2011 (UTC)