- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Raspar-6
- Nominated by: Stake black msg 14:16, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: WP:AST
(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
Support
IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 03:35, March 6, 2013 (UTC)- CC7567 (talk) 16:35, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Excellent work. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:43, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
Though see my comment below. 1358 (Talk) 23:35, March 9, 2013 (UTC)- Winterz (talk) 00:09, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
Object
Attack of the Clone
I'm finding myself resisting the fact that there isn't enough information for a full, sectioned article. Have you tried writing it with an intro and the full Layout Guide for planet articles?CC7567 (talk) 19:54, March 7, 2013 (UTC)- How's that? Stake black msg 20:53, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
In ref 3, it needs to be noted where Fry's statement came from, either as a direct link or with {{Twitter}}.- Done.
- Citing the Twitter status as a separate reference is fine too, but if possible I think it would be good to actually link the status within ref 3, e.g. "Jason Fry has stated" or something like that, just to make sure it's clear. CC7567 (talk) 16:08, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. Stake black msg 16:31, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Citing the Twitter status as a separate reference is fine too, but if possible I think it would be good to actually link the status within ref 3, e.g. "Jason Fry has stated" or something like that, just to make sure it's clear. CC7567 (talk) 16:08, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Done.
Is the "nearby agricultural world" confirmed as a planet or just a celestial object? If the former is the case, I think "planet" or "world" can be used more throughout the article for consistency.CC7567 (talk) 21:14, March 7, 2013 (UTC)- It's undefined. All we know is it's an inhabited celestial object, which is why I use the word 'world'. Stake black msg 02:38, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
Attack of the Season
In the Bts you have M-5 as the Atlas' system coordinates, yet in the infobox it is N-5...which one is correct? Plus, why not ref the infobox coordinates to the Atlas itself?- Oops. Generally I prefer to source what can be sourced to the online companion, since it is readily accessible to everyone, but whichever way you like it.
You refer to the celestial body as world several times, but if it is never confirmed that it was a planet, then why would you use a planet's synonym to refer to the celestial body? :p Correct this, sir.- "World" is not an exact synonym for planet. It is also a synonym for "celestial body".
- Not to butt in here, but you are linking [[Planet/Legends|world's]]. If it's unknown, you probably shouldn't like it either. 1358 (Talk) 23:35, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, someone else added it. Removed, thanks. Stake black msg 23:45, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
- My thoughts exactly. Winterz (talk) 00:09, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Not to butt in here, but you are linking [[Planet/Legends|world's]]. If it's unknown, you probably shouldn't like it either. 1358 (Talk) 23:35, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
- "World" is not an exact synonym for planet. It is also a synonym for "celestial body".
May I ask why the quotation marks in Raspar system?Winterz (talk) 20:46, March 8, 2013 (UTC)- Yeah, I think someone else added it. Removed. Stake black msg 14:13, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:12, March 10, 2013 (UTC)