Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Ranger-class gunship

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Ranger-class gunship
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Ranger-class gunship

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 16:42, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It's always annoying when an article has fanon, but you still have to check each source 3 times to make sure it's not.....

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:08, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 01:18, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 02:34, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Emperor Jarjarkine MP-Mandalorian Senate Hall 03:05, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
  5. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 03:11, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • My customary dogma objection: Subsection. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:04, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
    • Hey, the history section was not that large..... 501st dogma(talk) 16:40, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
  • Any alternate names you bold in the intro should be redirects to the parent article.
    • Cool, I'll keep that in mind in the future.
  • The first sentence of the "Role" section is kind of out of place. The section should talk specifically about duties, strengths, and weaknesses, not service affiliations. One way to adapt what you currently have is to re-frame it in the sense of talking about how the New Republic utilized the Ranger gunship. I would suggest taking a look at the TIE shuttle article as an example. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:12, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
    • That should work I believe. Thanks for looking it over. 501st dogma(talk) 20:59, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
  • Lacking attribution for this claim. Was considered one of the best what? Who considered it to be one of the best? "...the Ranger-class gunship was considered one of the best at that time." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:35, July 9, 2015 (UTC)
    • It's from Han and Leia's quote at the beginning of the section. She considers it one of the "best," though I'm not sure if that's enough to say it was considered one of the best, so if you don't think so, I can axe it. Also, she doesn't give what it's the best at.501st dogma(talk) 20:41, July 9, 2015 (UTC)
      • Just remove it. It's one person's opinion and not necessarily a fact. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:13, July 9, 2015 (UTC)
      • Actually, I have a better idea. Unless she's saying that sarcastically or something, you should say "...the Ranger-class gunship was, according to Chief of State Leia Organa Solo (or whatever her title was), one of the newest and best starships at that time." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:18, July 9, 2015 (UTC)
        • There. 501st dogma(talk) 23:44, July 9, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)