Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Pzob

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Pzob

  • Nominated by: Imperialles 16:25, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Warming up for Gamorr.

(3 ACs/6 Users/9 Total)

Support

  1. I fixed two instances of "eachother"; there is a space between the two words. Nice and clean otherwise. NAYAYEN:TALK 12:52, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Just added links to the new locations in the body, hope you don't mind. I'm anxious to read Gamorr! --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:52, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
  3. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 11:21, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
  4. -- 1358 (Talk) 18:42, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
  5. BeautimusTK-299 (Click Here) Imperial Emblem 10:45, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Thefourdotelipsis 12:46, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  7. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 01:32, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Inqvote --Eyrezer 09:45, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
  9. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 10:34, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Soresu
Skippy: Oink (Per Moff Ball Four)
  • Intro: You can give the name of "the sole surviving Imperial soldier", and even link it.
  • Description: "Apart from the presence of a Galactic Empire base during the Imperial Period,[4] no major galactic power lay claim to Pzob" You said it was a secret base, thus I don't think the Empire really laid claim to Pzob which is more or less public. Maybe you could reword this?
  • History: I know you won't have all the information, with all those "prior to", but are you sure the events are chronologically ordered? Gamorrean settlement before 18 BBY; Republic discovering the word between 5,000-3,000 BY; last official report before 38 BBY. The settlement sounds more probable after the Republic discovers the planet.
  • Why did the Gamorreans began attacks against the Imperial base? If it was for no apparent reason, that would be worth mentioning.
  • History, 4th paragraph: Please tell the end of the story. The Eye probably left Pzob with its prisoners, bound for somewhere. Specify that; as far as we know, the Eye is still in Pzob!
  • You're gonna be asked to create a link for the Imperial base, and at least write a stub.
  • Also, link Pzob Forest Battle Yard.
  • Suggestion: If The Essential Atlas Online Companion lists a "Pzob system" instead of the K749 system, then the K749 system is also known as Pzob system (Similar to J11.9 / Tatoo system; LM0228 / Lamaro system).
  • Skippy Farlstendoiro 14:20, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
    • Most of these should be addressed, take a look. As for the Atlas thing, sure, that makes sense, but I'm not comfortable with assumptions. --Imperialles 14:42, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
Eyrezer
  • A few things, but I confess I am mostly wanting to edit this as a test of the new GAn subpage watchlist system! Is there a reason the Battle arena is not listed in the infobox as a location of interest?
  • I think it would be appropriate to add something to the BTS regarding the Atlas' rationale for naming it the "Pzob system". I'm fairly certain there is a forum post by Jason Fry floating around here he says they gave it the more notable name...
  • I'm a little uncertain about saying it was in no major conflicts. Is this based solely on no source mentioning it, or does a source say it was not involved? If it is an inference from lack of information, I don't know that is necessarily sufficient. Just because we don't know it wasn't involved, doesn't mean it wasn't. If it is a case of inference from silence, I'd prefer to just say nothing.
  • I moved the pic down so that 1) it can be larger and 2) there was a larger empty space there. Hope you don't mind. --Eyrezer 00:18, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
    • Added the Battle Yard to the infobox. I've looked through the end notes and various previews of the Atlas, and could not find a mention of the rationale. The Atlas does state it wasn't involved in any conflicts, by excluding it from all war maps. I removed the sentence, however. --Imperialles 06:46, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
      • See, I don't find it enough to say because it was not on a map it was not involved. I bet I can find dozens of Clone Wars engagements that do not appear on the maps. The maps do not list every engagement and therefore it is an argument from silence, which I do not see as accaptable. --Eyrezer 02:06, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
        • The information has been removed for over a week now. --Imperialles 07:20, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
          • Aha! I've been largely away for a week so that might explain it. --Eyrezer 23:01, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
      • When I am home I will see what I can find about the naming but I believe Jason discussed it on the JCF, and explained their rationale. --Eyrezer 02:06, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
        • I'll just add this in myself if I can find it. --Eyrezer 09:45, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
  • Could you properly link to the "Short bipedal creature" listed in the infobox (and the body)? If it's a unique, confirmed subject in Star Wars, it deserves an article.
  • Please vary up the two sentences starting with "When" in the intro to give the article a little more contrast.
  • "and the light from Pzob's sun bathed the environment in a golden hue": please link to the sun.
  • That's it from me. CC7567 (talk) 01:35, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
    • Useless stubs created, wording changed. --Imperialles 07:20, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 10:34, June 11, 2010 (UTC)