- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Plasma detonator
- Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:56, May 27, 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Nothing amazes me more than the fact that even now I can discover a prominently visible film prop that was actually named back in 2000 that's never had an article and so go research it
(4 ACs/3 Users/7 Total)
Support
- Fan26 (Talk) 14:08, May 29, 2019 (UTC)
- QuiGonJinn
(Talk) 09:04, May 31, 2019 (UTC) - Looks like a random piece of scenery to me. Zed42 (talk) 09:07, June 5, 2019 (UTC)
Tommy 
Macaroni 21:12, June 7, 2019 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:20, June 8, 2019 (UTC)- Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:56, June 9, 2019 (UTC)
- Getting an extra AC vote simply because Anil and I happened to review on IRC at the same time. haha MasterFred(Whatever) 00:14, June 10, 2019 (UTC)
Object
Fan
Forgive me if there's an obvious answer to this I'm not aware of, but if Inside the Worlds of Episode 1 named it, shouldn't there be a legends page as well? Fan26 (Talk) 11:55, May 29, 2019 (UTC)- There should be one, but no one's written it. Feel free to go ahead and write it if you wish. There's nothing in our policies that requires it to exist for this nomination though. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:15, May 29, 2019 (UTC)
Zed
Not exactly an objection, but should the TCW episode mentioned in ref 5 be formatted with the template? I'd have thought that the episode title in quotation marks would do fine.Zed42 (talk) 07:25, June 5, 2019 (UTC)- Fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:46, June 5, 2019 (UTC)
Tommy
I think you should add something on their design to the intro, it's currently looking a little bare.- How's it look now? Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:26, June 6, 2019 (UTC)
- I think you forgot to remove the latter bit. I also think you should mention the colour here, as well as the yellow centre which can also be in the infobox. Tommy Macaroni 07:09, June 7, 2019 (UTC)
- Oops, fixed. That's why you don't try and edit articles before rushing off to work. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:58, June 7, 2019 (UTC)
- And the yellow thing in the infobox. Tommy Macaroni 09:55, June 7, 2019 (UTC)
- I've added it to color. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:56, June 7, 2019 (UTC)
- And the yellow thing in the infobox. Tommy
- Oops, fixed. That's why you don't try and edit articles before rushing off to work. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:58, June 7, 2019 (UTC)
- I think you forgot to remove the latter bit. I also think you should mention the colour here, as well as the yellow centre which can also be in the infobox. Tommy
- How's it look now? Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:26, June 6, 2019 (UTC)
I also think some more infobox fields should be used. Perhaps shape, color, and purpose, depending on what you think?- I've added colour and shape, but for purpose I don't really think we have enough info to say anything beyond it being a weapon. It's trained on the supplicants but wether to defend the council from them or to allow the council to punish them isn't clear. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:26, June 6, 2019 (UTC)
Have you check the appearances of High Board Room: The Phantom Menace (Golden Book) (I don't know if it's a picture book), Raiders of the Lost Gundark, Otoh Gunga in the Encyclopedia.Tommy Macaroni 21:35, June 6, 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed I have. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:26, June 6, 2019 (UTC)
You should probably give the slide numbers for the SW.com sources, and is there a reason why those sources aren't Po?Tommy Macaroni 12:01, June 7, 2019 (UTC)
- Given, the concept art gallery isn't po as the detonator has labels in the art. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:04, June 7, 2019 (UTC)
In regards to your response to Fan, I think a Legends article should be created, as technically that should be a redlink, which does violate rule 9.Tommy Macaroni 17:37, June 7, 2019 (UTC)
- Fair point, done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:21, June 7, 2019 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:14, June 10, 2019 (UTC)