Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Pitrillistian

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Pitrillistian

  • Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 04:56, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It's 99% Fourdot's work, but here's the bump to GA!

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Inqvote --Eyrezer 06:55, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:12, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Menkooroo 17:37, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 21:04, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
  5. OLIOSTER (talk) 21:15, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. Can you crop out the triangle in the lower left of the image. --Eyrezer 09:52, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
    • I'm going to try a rescan today or tomorrow so I can fix artifacts like that and hopefully split the two Pitrillistiams so one can go in the infobox and one can go in the body. Stay tuned. ~ SavageBob 15:56, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
      • Images adjusted. ~ SavageBob 04:33, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
        • Heaps better. Good work. --Eyrezer 06:55, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Actually, despite my vote, I do have an objection. You seem to treat this species as fully sentient, using the Sentient infobox template, the Sentient species layout, and the following phrase, "which made them an imposing sight to other sentients." If the species is confirmed to be sentient by the source, please state this outright in the article. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:29, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
    • I thought it was enough to imply sentience through that line, but no matter: I've stated it outright. ~ SavageBob 18:25, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:17, October 29, 2010 (UTC)