Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Persha

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Persha
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Toprawa
        • 1.1.2.2 Prince of Persha
        • 1.1.2.3 Attack of the Clone
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Persha

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 19:29, October 23, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A random Primate

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 03:06, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 22:58, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:01, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Menkooroo (talk) 01:33, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:21, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
  6. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 23:26, January 4, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • The intro quote forgot the "o" in "Threepio." Is this just a typo?
    • Yep, my bad.
  • Since the intro quote mentions the other members of the Galactic Alliance group, I think the Biography should mention and link to them as well. 21:36, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
    • Okay, added. Thanks for the review, he-who-uses-five-tildes-instead-of-four. 501st dogma(talk) 22:06, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
Prince of Persha
  • Since she's some sort of bureaucrat, there oughtta be something in the infobox's affiliation field, as well as a category applicable to her profession. Be creative.
    • Like so?
  • In the bio's leading quote: Is the "you" a typo? If so, sic, if not, you know the drill.
    • Nope, as she is talking directly to the group.
      • Still, "will strive to fulfill you every request" is... wrong. Seems like a sic would be in order.
        • Bah, thought you meant the intro's quote - bio's is changed. 501st dogma(talk) 00:23, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Ref [2] should have a page number for the CSWE (I can provide it if you don't have it).
    • There, added.
  • Good job. I'm loving the attention you're giving to the NJO. Just a note that I changed "2003's The New Jedi Order installment" to "the 2003 The New Jedi Order installment," since the former read as if Remnant were the only NJO installment of 2003. Menkooroo (talk) 15:13, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
    • Ah, that's true. Thanks again for the review. 501st dogma(talk) 19:06, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
  • Is there enough info to create an article for the Galantos government, since the infobox identifies it as such? CC7567 (talk) 19:36, December 26, 2013 (UTC)
    • There you go. 501st dogma(talk) 21:34, January 4, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:26, January 4, 2014 (UTC)