Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Old One-Eye

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Old One-Eye
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Ayrehead
        • 1.1.2.2 Floyd
        • 1.1.2.3 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Old One-Eye

  • Nominated by: Trip391 (talk) 03:56, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 14:04, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 18:32, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ACvote grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 15:35, June 6, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:21, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:36, July 23, 2015 (UTC)
  6. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 03:45, July 23, 2015 (UTC)

Object

  • History section should introduce One-eye as a rancor in the beginning. 501st dogma(talk) 23:05, May 6, 2015 (UTC)
    • Done Trip391 (talk) 02:21, May 7, 2015 (UTC)
  • P&T should probably mention that he had tough skin.
    • Added
  • Also, do you see the Rancors after they mount them to catch Liq? 501st dogma(talk) 01:48, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
    • Added Trip391 (talk) 02:58, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Can you tell which of the Jedi rode on Old-One Eye specifically? Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:10, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
    • It was Ahsoka, so I've added in who was riding each rancor. Trip391 (talk) 16:38, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
Floyd
  • Is there a year for this? The Prize Contender article places it at c. 22 BBY and sources that to the Essential Reader's Companion.
    • TERC doesn't mention Prize Contender, or the what happened in the illegal rancor fight, so I've removed it from that article as well
  • Intro: Any reason why Tano and Skywalker were there? IFYLOFD (Talk) 21:06, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
    • They aimed to stop Raice Liq, a Muun who used the fights to transfer Republic munitions data to the Separatists. Trip391 (talk) 03:03, July 21, 2015 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Preliminary objections:
    • The image quality is terrible. There's almost no reason why an infobox image shouldn't be at least 250px to fill the standard infobox size. Since I'm assuming you're using a pirated version of this comic, the best you can do is use a larger crop to fill the space.
      • I re-uploaded a larger crop.
    • Characters get Biographies, not Histories. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:05, July 21, 2015 (UTC)
      • Changed Trip391 (talk) 20:30, July 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Grammatically, there should be a comma before "gentlebeings" in the main quote. Does the source actually omit this comma? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:39, July 22, 2015 (UTC)
    • It correctly uses the comma, so I fixed it.
  • Reviewing note(s):
    • "Klick" is informal slang. Avoid this kind of language in formal writing.
    • The Personality and traits section was unnecessary, since all of that information could easily have been worked into the Bio, which I have done. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:39, July 22, 2015 (UTC)
      • Thank you. Trip391 (talk) 01:04, July 23, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Too big to be a CAN, see here. —Unsigned comment by Trip391 (talk • contribs)

  • Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:45, July 23, 2015 (UTC)