Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/O'cerry

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 O'cerry
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Lee attacks
        • 1.1.2.2 Return of the Jedi
      • 1.1.3 Comments

O'cerry

  • Nominated by: Tinwe(comlink) 07:59, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Despite being only palm-sized—though I can't quite tell the size of the palm in question—they proved too large to be CANned.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 12:11, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
  2. —Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 03:05, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
  3. ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 02:44, January 25, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Top o' the marnin' to ya! Menkooroo 18:29, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 07:40, February 4, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Lee attacks
  • Is NOTOC still needed?
    • Nope, that was a leftover from when I thought the article was going to be a CA. Good catch.
  • Please mention their homeworld in the intro.
    • I've done that. Their homeworld is a moon called Alchenaut, as far as I can tell (notice the wording: the moon of Alchenaut, not a moon). Technically the homeworld could also be a moon of a planet called Alchenaut, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't meant to read that way. Thanks for taking a look! Tinwe(comlink) 12:03, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Otherwise good work. Clone Commander Lee Talk 09:41, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • The o'cerry was a non-sentient herbivore native to the moon of Alchenaut.: This makes it sound like the o'cerry are one single individual. By adding species between herbivore and native should fix the problem. Clone Commander Lee Talk 12:05, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
    • Done. Tinwe(comlink) 12:09, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
Return of the Jedi
  • Context on The Jedi Path's first mention in the body.
    • I sort of thought this contextifies itself, given the "A Manual of Students of the Force" part of the name... :P Anyway, I've added some context, feel free to tweak if necessary.
      • I was really only thinking of having you add "book," but that works, too. :P —Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 03:03, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • Can we really say that it had pupilless eyes? It appears from the picture to have two small, white dots in the middle of both eyes. Could this not be two special pupils that it has?—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 02:31, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
    • I suppose they could be, so I took out the pupilless part. By the way, Cal, I noticed that you removed the {{1st}} template during your copy-edit. Was it because "First appearance" should be reserved for in-universe appearances? (One could argue that TJP is just that, since the book is written from an in-universe perspective, but I know we treat it as a source just like The New Essential Chronology and the lot.) I'm aware that articles with only one source/appearance don't necessarily need any of the appearance templates, but I like to include them in case the subject of the article appears in any future works. Do you know what the correct appearance template (or templates) would be in this case? Tinwe(comlink) 07:44, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
      • I removed it because the {{1st}} template should never be used in the Sources section, only in the Appearances section. I'm not a hundred percent sure what we'd use here. I would personally just leave it blank, but I think that a {{1stm}} template could be used. However, don't forget that you shouldn't add merely a {{Mo}} template, since Sources are Mo by definition. Hope that makes sense.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 03:03, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
        • I must have had a brain fart moment of sorts there, since after all these years here I do know that {{1st}} is applied only to the Appearances section. Guess the in-universe nature of TJP had me fooled. :) Thanks for the review! Tinwe(comlink) 10:55, January 23, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 07:40, February 4, 2012 (UTC)


  • Before anyone asks: yes, the beginning of the Clone Wars in 22 BBY can be sourced to The Jedi Path; the date is mentioned in Luke's introductory letter thingy. Tinwe(comlink) 07:59, January 21, 2012 (UTC)