- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Nebo
- Nominated by: IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 06:36, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Generic crazy guy.
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
- Looks good. DarthRageLeave a message after the beep
You should pay attention to the reviews and changes made to your other nominations and make the same changes to any other nominations you have. Specifically regarding linking. Don't rely on other people to fix things for you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:30, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Grunny (talk) 00:21, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
I am pleased with how you are progressing into your own, Floyd. You are becoming more refined in your writing style.—Tommy 9281 06:14, August 17, 2010 (UTC)- Those refs seem redundant, though... -- 1358 (Talk) 12:09, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
Object
Twin:
Linking is a problem. Please go through the article and make sure everything is linked accordingly.- I went through it, and I think its good now.
As stated above, you should pay closer attention to the reviews and changes made to your other nominations and make the same adjustments to any related nominations you have. I've noticed here several of the same things that I objected to on Rask.- Addressed.
"Nevertheless, Nebo and Rask continued to vocally support the darksiders even after their defeat." This makes it sound as though Nebo and Rask were not members of that same organization.- Reworded.
- That's all.—Tommy 9281 20:54, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks as always for the review. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 03:22, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- No prob, good job.—Tommy 9281 06:14, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
Xd1358
Those "appearance facts" in the Bts are selfsourcing. There is no need for those refs.-- 1358 (Talk) 14:34, August 17, 2010 (UTC)- How does this degrade the article? Yeah, they may not totally be necessary, but its a personal habit and preference of mine to source everything and I'd rather not remove them. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 21:52, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:05, August 18, 2010 (UTC)