Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Nartian

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Nartian

  • Nominated by: --Eyrezer 08:13, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Very interesting. :) JangFett (Talk) 22:38, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
  2. "Historic day" sounded POVish to me, so I cut it, but I won't cry if you want to put it back. :) ~ SavageBob 04:47, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
  3. So, I'll have to do a multi-armed species to balance your work? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 08:23, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 08:58, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 14:39, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Grunny (Talk) 14:00, November 16, 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. Skippy Farlstendoiro
    • You describe Nartians as traditionally serving noble families. Should you mention, when describing Nackhar, that Wuher and Chalmun are not exactly the aristocrats Nartians commonly serve?
    • Nackhar's article says that he "also ran a fast-food stand in the Mos Eisley marketplace." Is it true? If it is, can it be included in the article?
    • You've got quite an obsession with multi-armed species, don't you? ;P--Skippy Farlstendoiro 11:36, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
      • Ok. I've added the fast-food vendor bit. Re aristocrats: I added a bit to the final sentence in the History section, which clarifies your point and then also located Tatooine in Arkanis, so it is clear it is not one of the Senex worlds. How does it look now? --Eyrezer 03:22, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
  2. "Nackhar cleaned up the mess after two incidents of violence in the establishment that day." Is this really needed in the intro? Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 22:55, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
    • Removed. --Eyrezer 07:03, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:00, November 16, 2009 (UTC)


  • Thanks for the review, JangFett. I removed the "planet of" however. A personal preference. :) --Eyrezer 23:16, October 19, 2009 (UTC)