Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Naima

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Naima
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Lew
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Naima

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 04:07, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 351 words (72 introduction, 242 body, 37 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 347 words (72 introduction, 242 body, 33 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS WP:WOMEN

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 20:07, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 21:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
  3. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 02:24, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 03:03, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Object

Lew
  • As I understand, the CSWE cite should use Template:CSWECite Lewisr (talk) 06:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
    • Added the template CometSmudge (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Does she actually appear or would noting she was in a ship be more appropriate? Lewisr (talk) 06:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
    • She is only in a ship, but since novels don't actually visually depict most subjects, I didn't think it was necessary to note that. CometSmudge (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
      • I think saying she appeared as it is now gives the wrong impression. If the V-wing appears when Naima's piloting it I don't see any harm in noting she appeared as a starfighter. Otherwise I think it should be changed to mentioned Lewisr (talk) 06:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
        • Alright, noted it was as a starfighter CometSmudge (talk) 18:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:03, 22 February 2025 (UTC)