Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Microbe armor

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Microbe armor

  • Nominated by: Skippy Farlstendoiro 17:34, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: You like/d my other nom on a RPG geeky armor that no-one ever used? Well, meet this pseudo-Barabel thing! Available through Galladinium's Datalog at galladinium.com ; PayPal is accepted.

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 11:38, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Xd1358
Jang
  • After correcting some formatting in the article, I noticed that you grouped several sources together to create one reference. Farl, there's no reason for you to do this. Keep it simple. One source per reference tag, and not many sources bundled into one reference. Also, keep in mind of overlinking in the reference tags. JangFett (Talk) 20:52, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
    • Point is, in my other GAN here I've been proposed to do exactly this. Specially in articles with so few sources, I'd rather link all the information from each of them ref'ed. Maybe I can convince you to keep the article as it is now?--Skippy Farlstendoiro 17:46, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
      • Not to butt in, but you were not requested to group several sources in a reference. I told you to not do this, and Cav told you to not use multiple references for one fact (not to group them again). 1358 (Talk) 15:33, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
Prepare to be savaged...
  • Can you make sure nothing in boldface is linked to in the first line of the lead? Specifically, Barabel should be delinked when in bold, and then relinked somewhere else.
  • Rather than treating the discrepancies as conflictual in the BTS, I'd consider them as examples of variants in the kinds of this armor for sale. In other words, no different from a blue T-shirt and a red T-shirt. For that reason, I'd suggest moving that information to the main body of the article. ~ SavageBob 19:15, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

  1. ACvote Jang's objection has been outstanding for two weeks. (Apologies if I started this an hour too early or so; screw timezones :P) 1358 (Talk) 21:09, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Agreed, and very much per Xd. No one told the nominator to group references like that. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:11, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 23:32, November 2, 2010 (UTC)