Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/MI-726

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 MI-726
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Cav
        • 1.1.2.2 Toprawa
        • 1.1.2.3 El Jefe
      • 1.1.3 Comments

MI-726

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:26, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:Hopefully worth all the boring CA noms.

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 12:11, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:42, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Great work, Ayre. Clean stuff. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 19:50, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 23:29, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Supreme Emperor (talk) 00:14, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Cav
  • Some more can be added to characteristics I think; bipedal nature, armor plating color, that kind of thing. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 10:10, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
    • Added the details you mentioned although aren't they normally put into the series description not individual models? Same way you'd say a species was bipedal not an individual character. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:02, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
      • Well, the bipedal one maybe, but it doesn't hurt to put it here. The colorations definitely needed to go in the article, however. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 12:11, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • The Characteristics refers to the events of the single incident with the factory security guard as if the droid did this kind of thing regularly. Is there any evidence that there were plural instances of the droid "[berating] some victims during its attacks on Imperials but did not always necessarily kill all foes involved," or did the droid only do that the one time with the guard? If it's the latter, that means this should be reworded to reflect that the droid only did this on a single occasion. Otherwise, we're just extrapolating on this one event. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:47, August 26, 2013 (UTC)
    • Changed so that there is no long extrapolation. Ayrehead02 (talk) 02:07, August 27, 2013 (UTC)
      • Better, but the last bit about "but did not always necessarily kill all foes involved" is still kind of bugging me. That makes it seem like we have multiple examples to draw from to make this conclusion, but I think you're just using that one example with the security guard. I think you should reword that sentence to specifically mention the security guard and say the droid did not kill the guard in that singular instance. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:09, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
        • Changed to be specific to the one situation. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:20, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
          • Perfect. Well done. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:42, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
El Jefe
  • One nitpicky thing: "who insulted the man's heritage and questioned his legitimacy" The P&T quote just says he insulted both, not questioning his legitimacy, just insulting it. IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 02:07, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    • Fair point, changed the wording. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:49, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:15, September 5, 2013 (UTC)