Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/MD-0C6

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

MD-0C6

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 07:52, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Wascawwy wobot. ~ SavageBob 21:36, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Interesting droid. -- 1358 (Talk) 11:29, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Chack Jadson (Talk) 16:51, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 14:20, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Xd1358
  • Any reason why you link to "Doc" in the intro? It's a disambiguation page, and as far as I know, we don't link to them.
  • More to come eventually. -- 1358 (Talk) 16:17, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
  • Please provide context for Hugo Bartyn.
  • "Hugo Bartyn really wanted": this one is a bit picky, but "really" can be interpreted in two ways here, which makes it unclear. Are you saying that Bartyn "actually" wanted to build his own town, or that he "had a strong urge" to build his own town? Even if it's the latter, "really" is rather colloquial when used in this way, so please reword in either case.
  • You need to use a {{1st}} or {{1stm}} tag in the article somewhere regardless if both appearances are concurrent. If that's the case, the 1st tag has a field to address the simultaneous release issue, and you can use {{C}} for the other one. CC7567 (talk) 20:25, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Cylka
  • He is listed in the CSWE. Check the entry to make sure you have all of the info. I'll review afterward. Cylka-talk- 05:02, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Prepare to be savaged...
  • "known for his strict priorities." This seems to end too abruptly; what were his strict priorities?
  • The final paragraph of the lead could use with a time designation. When did this events happen?
  • "whose acts could harm him." Who is "him" in this case, Doc or the patient? C'est tout. ~ SavageBob 18:03, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Xd, "real" rewiew..
  • Any reason why there is no description section? (or something like that) You have a lot info that is currently infobox-only. -- 1358 (Talk) 18:52, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Droids do not have P&T sections. They have Characteristics sections AFAIK. -- 1358 (Talk) 15:37, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
  • Bio, last paragraph: "..was severely injured in a duel." Any indication of who he fought?
    • He fought the player characters, who are not identified. Article no changed.
  • Characteristics: "..during these trips in case his skills were needed." Who he "his" refering to? The droid, Liddell or F-RTZ-2?
  • I suggest you rename "Features" to description.
  • I also suggest that you add an image of something related to him.
  • Interesting read, Farl. -- 1358 (Talk) 09:25, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
Jujiggum
  • "active from at least 529 BBY to at least 29 BBY." The current placement of this in the intro doesn't make it very clear that you're referring to the droid; please reorder.
  • "Around 529 BBY, the droid claimed that he was the property of an employee of Outer Rim Oreworks (ORO)." Do you mean that he made this claim in the year 529, or that he later claimed that that's what he was in 529 BBY?
  • "and the droid came to be respected." Respected by whom? The beings of the community? The beings of the planet? The galaxy?
  • Is there enough info for an article on the raid in which Liddell was hurt?
    • Don't think so, but that shouldn't stop us. I'll expand that one eventually, and link other related articles later--Skippy Farlstendoiro 10:13, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
  • "His patient was his utmost priority, an attitude that led people in Bartyn's Landing to like him. to the point that the droid participated in the town's management." I believe you mean for this to be one sentence, no?
  • That's all. Interesting article. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 20:58, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:20, September 11, 2010 (UTC)